**
out of ****
I
wanted to love this movie – the trailers were so compelling and
intriguing that it seemed I absolutely would. Unfortunately, it
tries to be too many things, fails to be many of those things, and
sends a message that is so blatant it is like being beaten over the
head with a dead fish.
George
Clooney and Hugh Lawrie get top billing which is pretty comical –
Clooney only appears as a narrator until the movie is more than half
over, and Lawrie's screen time probably adds up to less that 15
minutes. Britt Robertson is the star of this film, and she is
unquestionably the best thing it has going. Robertson is best known
as the attempted suicide in “Delivery Man” (2013) and as Angie in
the TV show “Under the Dome”. She absolutely shines in this movie - too bad she didn't have more to shine with.
In
“Tomorrowland” Robertson is Casey Newton, one of those teens that
is a real gift to the world. She sees everything that humanity has
done to screw things up, but rather than simply rail on and on about
how it stinks, she wants to affect change to make it better. She is
“chosen” by Athena, a recruiter from Tomorrowland who tries to
find the best and brightest for a better future for all mankind. She
leaves her a trinket that allows her a glimpse of Tomorrowland, an
interdimensional place where the geniuses of the world congregate.
Casey becomes obsessed with finding a way to get there.
One
problem – Tommorrowland has given up on humanity. Having passed
some point of no return, the people of Tommorowland have established
a 100% certainty that humanity will destroy itself in about two
months, and have closed all the gateways between the worlds to make sure they don't get taken
down with us. But after Casey finds Frank Walker (Clooney), the one
person who knows how to get to Tomorrowland, he discovers that she is
kind of like Neo in “The Matrix” - she is the one that can change
that 100% certainty of armageddon and give us all a fighting chance.
I
understand that this film is meant to be hopeful, to be an anti-theme
to all the post-apocalyptic and Dystopian future stuff we find in the
movies today. It's “message”, that humanity is destroying itself
through it's many questionable endeavors – global warming, nuclear
fission, etc. - is just way too “in your face” for my taste.
Messages in movies need to have subtlety, not be something you see coming a
mile away and end up feeling, “I get it - enough already”.
Of
course, it isn't all bad. The performances are excellent (not surprising, considering the quality of the cast) and the special
effects are wonderful. The first half of the film does offer some
intrigue and you get caught up in it. But when we explore the places
the film eventually goes, we find them pretty hollow. I thought that
they could have offered a much more interesting look at the
alternative universe, because when we got there I just didn't see
anything at all appealing about it.
My
biggest problem with the film was that it tried to be all things to
all viewers. An action movie, a spy-thriller, robots and ray guns,
anti-freedom/government control film, revolutionar, family drama....
there is too much going on. A greater focus on the need for action
to save humanity, rather than have all these extraneous subplots,
would have allowed the message they want to be conveyed to be
clearer, more compelling, and less jammed down our throats.
This
film isn't awful, but it comes pretty close. They could have done so
much more with it that I think it is a disappointment more than
anything else.
I think it's more of a kid movie. I wanted to like it so much, and like you I ended up disappointed. But I talked to a little girl outside the theatre who had just seen it, and she loved it. It's just enough action/spy/robot/save the world for kids. Too bad they didn't market it that way.
ReplyDelete....and it being a Disney movie I figured it would have a lot of kid appeal too Holly. But I didn't think it was even all that good of a kid movie - it tries too hard to be a movie for the adult crowd too. Therein lies the problem really - the moviemakers wanted universal appeal instead of picking an audience and playing to it. It left the whole thing unsatisfying on the level of EVERY type of viewer. That would be my take, anyway.
ReplyDelete