Is it just me, or does it
seem that Meryl Streep would get an Academy Award nomination for
playing a catatonic quadriplegic? “Just look at how she lays there
and does nothing! Astounding!” She has received another nomination for
“Into The Woods” (her 19th) for playing an
over-the-top witch in such a way that, had it been anyone else, an
award nomination would never have been remotely considered.
I have found that a lot of
critics like this film. Why, I cannot say. Not only is it not very
entertaining, it is marketed to give you a completely
different idea of what the film is than what it actually turns out to be. The marketing suggests it is a whole new take on a bunch of
fairy tales, adding some dark and sinister elements to make it more
entertaining for the modern audience. Instead you get a full blown
musical (something the trailers don't suggest at all), which wouldn't
be so bad if virtually every song didn't remind me of “God
That's Good” from Sweeney Todd. At times I thought it was a lot
like “Rent” - the characters sing dialogue with virtually no melody
when a little spoken word would much better convey the scene.
And it isn't a retelling
of any of the stories – it's a total re-imagining of most of them. In some
cases it's necessary for the plot, but in some cases it's a real
head-scratcher. For instance, Cinderella does to the ball for THREE
straight nights, bolting from the unexpecting, dullard prince every
night. And the “darker” imagery is not so much to make it
tense or scary, it seems to just make it dreary. REALLY dreary. And it redefines
the characters as people we don't like enough to care about
their fate. The only story that follows the same basic plotline is that of
Red Riding Hood, but Lilla Crawford plays her as a unlikeable
brat. There really just isn't anything or anyone to root for. Streeps's witch is
as likeable as any of the “heroic” characters, and believe me that isn't saying much.
It just made for an unhappy film, and I was hoping it would end soon even before the final act began.
There are a couple of pretty good sequences. Chris
Pine is terrific as Prince Charming, and his duet “Agony” with
Billy Magnussen is not only musically interesting but genuinely
entertaining. Pine's character is a dullard and a little detestable (by
design), but he is easily the most interesting of the handful of
characters. Daniel Huttlestone, who plays Jack, certainly has a
beautiful singing voice but again his character (and that of his
mother) just aren't sympathetic enough to root for.
Overall I can't understand
why the critics are going so easy on this movie. Sad, boring, unsympathetic
and tedious.... it really was a waste of money. Perhaps the first
film I've been to since “The Allnighter” (1987) where I seriously
considered going to the management and asking for my money back.
No comments:
Post a Comment