Monday 19 January 2015

American Sniper (2014)

*** ½ out of ****

Okay, forget your politics, forget whether you're a liberal or a conservative, and put aside your feelings about the war in Iraq. Disregard your personal feelings about insurgents, the American troops and guerrilla warfare. If you don't you will find this film impossible to fully experience. And it is well worth experiencing.

If Clint Eastwood had never been an actor, his contribution to the movies as a director would be a unique and fairly amazing one. Yes, he won the Best Director Oscar twice (for “Unforgiven” 1992 and “Million Dollar Baby” 2003) and both those films also won Best Picture. And incidentally, are both on my “10 Favorite Movies Ever Made” list. But outside of those Clint has also directed such wonderful pictures as “A Perfect World” (1993), “Absolute Power” (1997), “Mystic River” (2003), “Letters From Iwo Jima” (2006), and “Gran Turino” (2008). There have also been a few duds, but overall he has churned out great work as a director.

And “American Sniper” is another great one. In it Bradley Cooper is Chris Kyle, a good ol' boy who grew up wanting to be a cowboy. After seeing the US Embassy Bombings in 1998 he enlists in the navy, becomes a Navy SEAL and eventually is deployed to Iraq. There, his sure-handed ability to shoot accurately over great distances allows him to become the deadliest sniper in US military history – he is so highly regarded that the men in his unit simply call him “Legend”.

Though the film is most compelling when showing his activities in Iraq, the real thrust of the story is how his experiences affect him personally, and how they affect his relationship with his wife (Sienna Miller) and their kids. Kyle goes back to Iraq for a total of four tours, and eventually is so haunted by his experiences that his shell shock seems capable of tearing him apart. How he deals with this, and how his family supports him are the soul of the picture, but the Iraq scenes are the meat on the bones.

A lot has been made of the fact that the movie has a politically “conservative” outlook – the war is never shown as anything but “just” and the Iraqis they fight are very simple and straightforward villains. Repeatedly Kyle refers to them as “savages”. However, I don't think that this detracted form the movie at all because it was all told from the point of view of the soldiers and their families, and that is how the HAVE TO view this type of action. That there were no voices calling “what are we doing there” is irrelevant to the film, as there would have been none of those voices present in these situations.

I also have to send out some respect to Bradley Cooper for his turn as Chris Kyle. Over his past few films he has proven himself to be much more than the pretty-boy type he originally appeared to be, and this performance continues on that trend. I battled myself a little in examining his performance because he plays a somewhat unintelligent, war-mongering Texan (not my personal favorite type of guy, cough-cough Bush) but in the final analysis he is excellent in the role. Everyone in this film plays well, but it is Cooper's performance that everything is based around and dependent on.

I have issues with several of this year's Oscar nominees, but not this one. It is moving, taut and at many times edge-of-your-seat, and you are drawn into the story and the characters. A worthy candidate for the big prize.

No comments:

Post a Comment