* out of ****
Childhood memories can be flawed. You
remember a long-ago relative as being a giant..... you meet him again
as an adult you find he's barely more than average size. Grandma's
basement was a labyrinth of treasures and secrets..... then you visit
years later and see it as small, dank and claustrophobic. You are
enthralled by a movie filled with excitement and intrigue..... then
watching it again decades later it is a truly silly piece of
cinematic trash.
Such is “Trancers”. A flick I
found very entertaining as a teen which on viewing now I can't
believe I ever liked. Although I will go easy on myself by
suggesting that some others must have enjoyed it as it has since
spawned two sequels.
Reveling in its own low-budget
limitations, “Trancers” is a fairly typical sci-fi time-waster
from the 80s. Tim Thomerson is Jack Deth (I have to give them this –
that's a great name), a 23rd century cop that spends his
time tracking “Whistler”, a psychic who can turn the weak minded
into brainless killing machines. When Whistler travels back in time
to kill the ancestors of those chasing him, Deth has to follow suit
and go back to 1985. They achieve this by transporting your
consciousness into the body of an ancestor, leaving your own body
behind. This was actually a nice plot device as it added the
challenge that Whistler's ancestor was a cop, giving him the
authority to remove anyone he suspects is after him from the picture.
One of the better parts of the movie is
Helen Hunt as Leena, a Madonna-wannabe that Deth meets up with in
1985. Though her actions and dialogue make no more sense than anyone
else's, you can at least see that Hunt's acting is a step above the wild
over- emoting that everyone else is projecting. Together Leena and Jack are able
to plot a way to stop Whistler and get everyone back into their own
time.
When I watched this years ago it seemed
to me that it was a “good bad movie” - one that you know was made
on a shoestring budget but that overcame that with a fun storyline. Now I
see that it is trying very hard to be just that, but the plot holes
and lack of continuity is often just plain silly. Thomerson isn't
bad in the role, but he really has nothing to work with here. The
best part of the entire film is his brief ability to stretch a single
second out into ten seconds (allowing for getaways from tight
situations). Early in the film that made for a great scene that really rocked the slo-mo.
But the whole thing just isn't very
good.....
Shattering youthful illusions is never
much fun, but at least I won't ever make the mistake of suggesting
anyone else ever watch it. Though it's not completely without
time-wasting capability, I am very confident that I won't ever make
any attempt to watch it again.
No comments:
Post a Comment