***
out of ****
I
realize that there are a lot of parallels in the story type, but
there were a lot of moments during “Spotlight” where I was
reminded strongly of “All the President's Men” (1976). Both tell
the story of news-people trying to investigate a cover-up, fought by
the system and forced to be surreptitious about their activities, and
as they go deeper finding the conspiracy is much bigger and broader
than they thought.
But
that's not the only reason I felt they were similar – just like
“President's Men” this film often sacrifices entertainment for
accuracy, making it a bit disjointed at times. That's really my only
complaint, other than the fact that watching this movie will piss you
off no matter how much you already know about the subject matter.
Michael
Keaton plays “Robby” Robinson, who leads an investigative
reporting team at the Boston Globe called 'Spotlight'. Other key
team members are Michael (Mark Ruffalo) and Sacha (Rachal McAdams).
When a new editor (Liev Schriber) comes on board in 2001 he assigns
them to investigate the sexual allegations being made against priests
in the Boston area. Thinking initially that there may be as may be
as many as 13 priests accused of sexual misconduct with minors, they
are stunned to eventually find 87 different priests in the Boston
area that have had legal or punitive action taken against them.
This
changes the scope of their investigation in that they stop trying to
only identify the priests, but determine if the Catholic Church,
specifically the local archbishop, knew about these activities and
actively tried to cover them up. Since this is Boston (very largely
Catholic) they find resistance at nearly every turn, even as the size
and scope of their findings shock and disgust them (and the viewer).
“Spotlight”
is a really excellent film filled with equally excellent
performances. Ruffalo's rage, McAdams disappointment and Keaton's calm disgust
offer the watcher just about every type of reaction that he or she may have regarding their findings, allowing you to really connect with at least one
of the key characters. Already being aware of most of the team's
findings I was absolutely disgusted in revisiting it, but am tickled
to death that it's in a film that is being widely recognized –
because this kind of thing continues to go on and the more people
that know about it the more chance it can be ended.
While
I wouldn't call this a real contender for “Best Picture”, I think
that this is largely because of it's devotion to following the story
accurately, which sacrifices some dramatic opportunities that the
story would have realized had this been a work of fiction. But
despite not considering it one of the real “Best Picture”
contenders, I absolutely think it is the most important film of the
year, and that it should be seen by absolutely everyone. Really a
great piece of true-story telling.
No comments:
Post a Comment