***
out of ****
Confession:
I went into this film with the highest expectations possible. I
absolutely adored Andy Weir's novel “The Martian”. I loved everything about
it, from the story to the science to the presentation to the
pacing.... everything. And I was of the opinion that this would, if
done correctly, make a wonderful movie. So with Matt Damon in the
starring role and directed by Ridley Scott, I went in thinking it was
going to be an automatic favorite.
Not
everything always goes exactly as planned, does it?
Before
getting into what I saw as the film's weaknesses, I'll first give a
synopsis and talk about what is right about it, and there is a lot
that is right. Mark Watney (Damon) is an astronaut on the “Aries
3” mission to Mars. He and five other crewmates spent months
traveling to the red planet, with the assignment of spending roughly
a month on the surface. However, early in their stay on Mars a
terrible dust storm hits, forcing them to abort the mission and blast
off back to their orbiting module, before the storm winds are strong
enough to knock over their launcher.
However,
in the storm Watney is hammered by a windblown satellite dish and
sent sailing off into the night. His biomonitor shows flatlines and
after a brief and frantic search in the storm, the captain of the
mission (Jessica Chastain) is forced to leave without him.
Unbeknownst to them, the impact of the satellite dish damaged
Watney's biomonitor (causing the flatlines) and he was simply
unconscious and injured. Waking hours later to an alarm telling him
his suit's life support was almost spent, he makes his way back to
the habitat, which was undamaged from the storm. Now alone on Mars,
unable to contact NASA and knowing he is presumed dead, Watney needs
to find a way to survive and let NASA know he is alright.
Not
all is as desperate as it initially seems. The habitat was designed to provide
for 6 people for a month, and they had double supplies as backups.
He has food, water and life support enough to last over a year....
but any possible rescue could take up to FOUR years. Martian soil
has no biomatter so crops can't be grown there, and though Watney has lots
of rocket fuel, he has no additional water. He realizes that in order to
survive he will have to, in his words, “Science the shit out of
this planet.”
The
movie tells the story well, creates the appropriate tension, and is
beautiful to watch. The characters are developed nicely, and they add
just the right notes of humour to the seriousness of the situation. The
science is (for the most part) accurate, which is pretty crucial to
the plotline. Certain elements of the storyline of the novel were
eliminated, but that was for time constraints – their loss didn't
really detract from the story. So this is a terrific, enjoyable
movie, offers entertainment as well as some things we can learn from,
and even has elements of personal sacrifice and altruism that make
many of the characters truly admirable.
That
being said, I thought it was missing something.....
Weir's
novel was almost ridiculously absorbing. As much as was possible was
written in the first person, with only elements that Watney couldn't
observe falling back into standard story-telling. But that left you
feeling CONNECTED to Watney. His innermost feelings and fears are
clear, and your heart aches for every setback he suffers and you feel
joy for every victory. The movie just doesn't offer the same
connection, which I found a little disappointing.
And
(trying not to spoil anything here) they throw actual physics out the
window for a cheap thrill near the end. In the book it was something
that Watney only suggested he try (as a joke more than anything) but in
the film they actually do it. I found that to be the worst possible
decision, as in reality it would never, ever work. Probably the only
thin gin the movie you could say that about.
Overall,
this is a wonderful film, equal parts “Robinson Crusoe”, “Apollo
13” and “McGyver”. You are caught right up in the storyline
and you root like hell for the protagonist not to die. While I can
highly recommend it, my review would probably be a bit more glowing
had I not first read the novel, or at least had I not loved the novel
so deeply. What I can say is that if you go to see it, only the most
shallow movie-goer won't be entranced by and enjoy this film.
But
then read the book. It's better. A lot.
No comments:
Post a Comment