Tuesday 22 November 2016

Arrival (2016)

** ½ out of ****

I'd heard so much about “Arrival” before I went to see it that I knew I would have to be careful not to get my expectations too high. Everything I'd read suggested that this was a highly intelligent film that would challenge you and didn't make any attempt to be “Hollywood”. Now right off the top I can say that I understand why people are writing such things, but they've all left out that it's also very slow moving and offers a payoff that really isn't quite worth the wait.

Amy Adams is Dr. Louise Banks, a renowned and highly respected linguist with a history as a translator for the US Government. When 12 huge alien crafts, dubbed “shells” by the media due to their shape, arrive in varied locations all over the world the government contacts her to come try to communicate with the aliens. The shells are in many different countries, all of whom seem to be trying to do their own thing to communicate with them, so the government sees it as a race to be able to talk with the aliens.

Banks, along with theoretical physicist Ian Donnelly (Jeremy Renner), seems to be making slow but steady progress in her communications, no small feat considering the aliens communicate solely through visual images they secrete in smoke. The progress  she makes isn't enough for the military, who appear to feel that whichever country is able to talk to the aliens first will be rewarded with a weapon that would give them terrible power over the other nations of the world. The other teams communicating with the shells feel similarly, believing the aliens are trying to set the nations of the Earth against each other, and the film becomes a race to confirm or disprove this idea before the army tries to destroy the shell.

Where all of the standard critics are saying this is “thinking man's sci-fi” and that it expresses interesting ideas that will get people talking, I have to admit I just don't see it. The film poses the government and military in their familiar role of “shoot first ask questions later”, with the scientists as the heroes trying to save the day, both of which are pretty standard sci-fi themes. "Arrival"  gets into some semi-interesting time/space ideas at the end, but though they're delivered in a way we haven't seen before, I'm not sure that makes the whole thing unique or especially great.

I've given the movie two and a half stars, which may not be fair to it as it is overall a pretty enjoyable film, if the slow-moving parts don't leave you too cold. But they left me pretty cold, and since the marketing of the film has had a tremendous amount to do with its “Rotten Tomatoes” rating (currently around 94%) they're pretty much begging you to look at it as a critical wonderkind. And to be frank, I just don't think it is. It's a solid, not-particularly-exciting piece of work that, unlike the really great sci-fi films, didn't leave me with any feeling that I needed to see it a second time.